The Hellenic Navy (HN) (Greek: Πολεμικό Ναυτικό, Polemikó Naftikó, abbreviated ΠΝ) is the naval force of Greece, part of the Greek Armed Forces. The modern Greek navy has its roots in the naval forces of various Aegean Islands, which fought in the Greek War of Independence. During the periods of monarchy (1833–1924 and 1936–1973) it was known as the Royal Navy (Βασιλικόν Ναυτικόν, Vasilikón Naftikón, abbreviated ΒΝ).The total displacement of all the navy's vessels is approximately 150,000 tons.The motto of the Hellenic Navy is "Μέγα το της Θαλάσσης Κράτος" from Thucydides' account of Pericles' oration on the eve of the Peloponnesian War. This has been roughly translated as "Great is the country that controls the sea". The Hellenic Navy's emblem consists of an anchor in front of a crossed Christian cross and trident, with the cross symbolizing Greek Orthodoxy, and the trident symbolizing Poseidon, the god of the sea in Greek mythology. Pericles' words are written across the top of the emblem. "The navy, as it represents a necessary weapon for Greece, should only be created for war and aim to victory."...............The Hellenic Merchant Marine refers to the Merchant Marine of Greece, engaged in commerce and transportation of goods and services universally. It consists of the merchant vessels owned by Greek civilians, flying either the Greek flag or a flag of convenience. Greece is a maritime nation by tradition, as shipping is arguably the oldest form of occupation of the Greeks and a key element of Greek economic activity since the ancient times. Nowadays, Greece has the largest merchant fleet in the world, which is the second largest contributor to the national economy after tourism and forms the backbone of world shipping. The Greek fleet flies a variety of flags, however some Greek shipowners gradually return to Greece following the changes to the legislative framework governing their operations and the improvement of infrastructure.Blogger Tips and Tricks
This is a bilingual blog in English and / or Greek and you can translate any post to any language by pressing on the appropriate flag....Note that there is provided below a scrolling text with the 30 recent posts...Αυτό είναι ένα δίγλωσσο blog στα Αγγλικά η/και στα Ελληνικά και μπορείτε να μεταφράσετε οποιοδήποτε ποστ σε οποιαδήποτε γλώσσα κάνοντας κλικ στη σχετική σημαία. Σημειωτέον ότι παρακάτω παρέχεται και ένα κινούμενο κείμενο με τα 30 πρόσφατα ποστς....This is a bilingual blog in English and / or Greek and you can translate any post to any language by pressing on the appropriate flag....Note that there is provided below a scrolling text with the 30 recent posts...Αυτό είναι ένα δίγλωσσο blog στα Αγγλικά η/και στα Ελληνικά και μπορείτε να μεταφράσετε οποιοδήποτε ποστ σε οποιαδήποτε γλώσσα κάνοντας κλικ στη σχετική σημαία. Σημειωτέον ότι παρακάτω παρέχεται και ένα κινούμενο κείμενο με τα 30 πρόσφατα ποστς.........

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Turkey wants to play it like the USA in Afghanistan..?..[ 1391 ]

       Should Turkey Declare War on Iraq ?            

From the usak-isro.blog., Saturday, 3 July 2010




Assoc. Prof. Sedat Laciner

The United States invaded Afghanistan, as it kept a group of terrorists. After refusal of the Taliban with regard to the extradition of Osama Bin Laden, the U.S. decided to invade Afghanistan. According to Americans, Afghanistan was now a source of terrorism and terrorist attacks like 9/11 were carried out by those who came based in Afghanistan. As a consequence of preemptive approach, the U.S. intervened to Afghanistan and pushed other allies to come to the country behind herself.

It can be definitely said that the U.S. was not successful in the past nine years: Currently, Afghanistan turned into a bigger source of terror and has made her neighborhood resemble herself. Despite her definite and clear failure, the U.S. has maintained her military-based policies in Afghanistan and expects international society to support herself with no hesitation.

By following the same logic, Turkey has to invade Iraq immediately: There are 5,000-6,000 PKK terrorists in northern Iraq, and they regularly cross the Turkish border in order to attack Turkey and return to Iraq. Places where all terrorists stay are evident. Unlike Bin Laden, they do not live in unknown caves. The coordinates of their camps are known by several states' security agencies. Moreover, different from Al Qaeda, they live in the Kandil Mountains, which can be besieged easily. If logistic support to the Kandil Mountain is prevented and crossing paths are controlled, it is clear that the PKK will be in trouble. Furthermore, hundreds of PKK terrorists leaving the camps move around in Iraqi territory. In other words, terrorists pass across areas already patrolled by U.S. soldiers and Barzani's Peshmergas, also under the control of U.S. air forces and satellites towards Turkey. Just after carrying out terrorist attacks, they return to the Kandil in front of the same eyes.

The PKK killed more than 5,700 civilians so far. The number of children killed by the PKK is over 370. In other words, if the PKK is not a terrorist organization, then who could be a terrorist? The PKK is enlisted as a terrorist organization by the U.S., Britain, Germany, France and many other states. Like the former U.S. President George W. Bush, the new President Barack Obama declared the PKK as a 'common enemy'.�American presidents said there is no difference between Al Qaeda and the PKK. Despite the situation and rhetoric, the PKK has managed to survive in Iraq, which everyone has known for years. In addition, from the 2003 Iraq War up until today, the PKK has multiplied its number almost three times under the wings of the U.S. forces.

Under these conditions, it is necessary to ask, should Turkey, just like the U.S., invade Iraq to stop terrorists' maneuvers? In the same way, should Turkey, likewise the U.S., seek help for counter-terrorism assistance as it is cited in Article 5 of the NATO alliance's agreement in case of being attacked by terrorists from outside?

Our American friends, in the face of these criticisms, present the difficulties of geography in Iraq, armed PKK militants etc. as an excuse. But in vain, it is strange that the U.S., a country that has taken the risk for many years to fight in Afghanistan, hesitates to involve in fighting against the PKK in a relatively easy geography.

Moreover, at this point it is necessary to ask how many PKK terrorists have been neutralized in Iraq by the United States since 2003. Let us ask our questions in a simpler way, since 2003, has a single PKK terrorist been harmed by the U.S. forces? Zero. The number of PKK terrorists who were captured, killed or harmed by U.S. forces is zero. In the last 7 years none of the 6,000 PKK militants was captured by the American friends.

Turkish people think the U.S. supports the PKK against Turkey. All surveys, studies and observations clearly prove that there is strong mistrust among the Turkish people against the U.S. PKK policies. Unfortunately, the statements we have described above reinforce these perceptions. Even some American journalists wrote that the U.S. provides financial assistance, ammunitions and training for the branches of the PKK.

The U.S. declares Syria and Iran on the lists of countries that support terrorism. Should Turkey prepare a similar list and includes the U.S.? Has the U.S., which has declared anyone as a terrorist, ever reviewed its own reports for Turkey in a sincere manner?

Clearly, it would be impossible to improve the relations between Turkey and the U.S. as long as the U.S.’s stance against the PKK remains the same. Under these conditions, the U.S. and Turkey can operate neither in the case of Iran nor in the fight against terrorism. In this context, the U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who claims Turkey walked away from the West due to errors of the European Union, has to consider the American mistakes as well. Obama says the PKK is a common enemy for Turkey and the U.S. while only Turkey, Syria and Iran fight against the PKK.


* Assoc. Prof. Sedat Laciner is the general coordinator of the International Strategic Research Organization, or USAK.

Presidential elections in Poland..[ 1390 ]

Poles vote in tight presidential run-off




Jaroslaw Kaczynski, presidential candidate of Poland's Law and Justice Party (PiS), speaks to the media next to Marta (C), daughter of the late Polish President Lech Kaczynski, her husband Marcin Dubieniecki (R) and their daughter Martyna outside a polling station in Warsaw, during presidential elections July 4, 2010.
Credit: Reuters/Slawomir Kaminski/Agencja Gazeta

WARSAW | Sun Jul 4, 2010 7:52am EDT
WARSAW (Reuters) - Poles voted on Sunday in a presidential election run-off that will help to decide the speed and scale of economic reforms, and set the tone for Warsaw's relations with its European Union partners and Russia.


The election was called after President Lech Kaczynski and many other top officials died in a plane crash in Russia on April 10.

It pits Kaczynski's identical twin Jaroslaw, the combative eurosceptic leader of the main right-wing opposition party, against Bronislaw Komorowski, candidate of Poland's ruling centrist Civic Platform (PO).


Most opinion polls have signaled a victory for Komorowski, who automatically became acting president on Lech Kaczynski's death in his role as speaker of parliament.


However, polls usually underestimate support for Kaczynski, who has narrowed the gap in recent weeks and lagged by just five percentage points in a first round of voting on June 20.


Financial markets favor a Komorowski presidency, expecting him to work smoothly with Prime Minister Donald Tusk's market-oriented government as it tries to rein in a big budget deficit while keeping a fragile economic recovery on track.


But Kaczynski's blend of Catholic piety, his opposition to spending cuts and privatization and his distrust of big business, EU bureaucrats and Poland's historic foe Russia strike a deep chord, especially among older and poorer voters.


"I voted for Kacyznski because he is honest, trustworthy and a true patriot who will do what is best for Poland," said Ryszard Krysztofik, 80, a retired TV repairman, after voting.

In Poland, the government led by the prime minister sets policy, but the president can propose and veto laws, appoints many key officials and has a say in foreign and security policy.

VETO FEARS

Investors fear Kaczynski would use his presidential veto to block reforms, just as his brother Lech did before his death.


A musician who gave his name as Leslaw, aged 38, said: "Only Kaczynski can block the bills those free-market sharks and crooks will try to force through for the sake of their cronies."


Economists say the zloty and government bonds would weaken in the event of a Kaczynski victory, although not too sharply.

Casting his vote after attending mass at a church in a leafy Warsaw suburb, Kaczynski said: "I appeal to everyone to vote because that is a great value of democracy."


The Komorowski camp fears that the mid-summer timing of the election, combined with unusually hot weather, will help Kaczynski as its younger, wealthier core voters are more likely to take holidays and fail to cast their ballots.


Around 30 million Poles in a total population of 38 million are eligible to vote. Turnout in the first round was 54 percent. Polling stations will close at 8 p.m. (1800 GMT) and exit polls showing final estimated results will be published immediately.


Komorowski, a moustachioed, bespectacled father of five, hopes the government's success in averting recession in Poland during the global economic crisis -- the only country in the 27-strong EU to do so -- will help propel him into the top job.


"Komorowski suits me better, especially his program which is more pro-market," said Maciej Palasz, 33, an engineer.

"We've seen what the Kacyznskis can do, so now let's give Komorowski a chance and see how he performs," said Arkadiusz Navrocki, 25, a cook.


Though seen as capable, Komorowski lacks charisma and has also avoided sharp attacks on Kaczynski due to the latter's bereavement.

Kaczynski, a bachelor who was very close to his twin, has benefited from public sympathy since the crash. The flag above the presidential palace is still flying at half-mast until the arrival of a new head of state.


Kaczynski served briefly as prime minister in 2006-07 when his nationalist views strained ties with the EU, Germany and Russia. But he has struck a conciliatory tone on the campaign trail in a bid to win over middle-of-the-road voters.


Victory would crown a remarkable comeback for a politician who looked weak and marginalized before his brother's death, his party lagging well behind Tusk's pro-business, pro-euro PO.


(Writing by Gareth Jones, editing by David Stamp)
*

Question...? [ 1389 ]

 Flags or Clubs ?



Q : Exists any country in the world where the Law accepts these clubs as small flags
 
A : Yes! This country  is Greece  !

--

Cuban opposition activist and longtime hunger striker..[ 1388 ]

State media: Cuban hunger striker 'in danger of dying'


Guillermo Farinas, a psychologist and writer, at his home in Santa
 Clara, Cuba, in March.
Guillermo Farinas, a psychologist and writer, at his home in Santa Clara, Cuba, in March.
By David Ariosto, CNN
July 3, 2010 -- Updated 2210 GMT (0610 HKT)
Havana, Cuba (CNN) -- Cuban opposition activist and longtime hunger striker Guillermo Farinas is "in danger of dying," state media reported Saturday.
In a rare move, state-run Cuban website Cubadebate published an interview with Armando Caballero, head of intensive care at Arnaldo Milian Castro University Hospital, where Farinas is being treated.
Caballero said Farinas is "conscious [and] oriented," but his frail condition has doctors "on edge," according to the website.
Caballero also said Farinas has gained weight because of vitamins and nutrients being fed to him intravenously, despite having abstained from solid food for more than 120 days. The article touted the high level of care the 48-year-old psychologist and writer has reportedly been receiving at the hospital near his home in Santa Clara.
Farinas stopped eating solid food shortly after jailed Cuban dissident Orlando Zapata Tamayo died February 23 following a prolonged hunger strike. Zapata was among a group of 75 dissidents jailed during a government crackdown on political opposition in 2003.
His death sparked condemnation from Europe and Washington and drew a rare statement of regret from Cuban President Raul Castro.
Farinas then vowed to starve himself to death unless the Cuban government released 26 ailing political prisoners.
Cuba says it has no political prisoners and has rarely acknowledged dissidents in state media. But a recent series of transfers of prisoners to jails closer to their homes and the release of two ailing prisoners has raised questions over whether Cuba is easing conditions for jailed activists.

Boeing Dreamliner ..[ 1387 ]

Composite material used in Boeing 787 raises safety questions


Boeing Dreamliner
Boeing Dreamliner (DREW PERINE, McClatchy-Tribune / December 14, 2009)